Apollo Project Brief Guide
A practical starting point for project use, dimensions, quantities, destination, timing, drawings and other information that helps Apollo review the requirement.
Start Project BriefApollo professional project resources
Consultants, contractors, procurement teams and project partners can use this index to reach the project guide, checklist, working template or comparison matrix that matches the task in front of them.
01 · Project guides
Use these guides to structure the information a project team needs before product selection, quotation or tender review.
A practical starting point for project use, dimensions, quantities, destination, timing, drawings and other information that helps Apollo review the requirement.
A cross-category project guide covering product identity, current technical information, project-specific requirements, local responsibilities, substitutions and required documents.
A practical guide to using datasheets, test reports, certificates, calculations, manuals, drawings and warranties for the relevant product and project.
02 · Working templates
Open the live template to copy it, download CSV or print / save PDF. Direct anchors remain stable so teams can link to the exact tool.
Master sports-turf overview plus print-ready Hockey, Football, Rugby and School/Community Multisport one-pagers for clubs, schools, councils, developers and project teams.
Copyable and downloadable hockey, football, rugby and school/community multisport specification schedules with exact-system evidence and project-responsibility controls.
A working checklist for scope, technical documents, commercial terms, logistics, local responsibilities and handover.
A document-control template for requested, received, reviewed and approved technical project information.
A structured international project brief covering site, drawings, scope, performance, climate, documentation, programme, freight and local works.
03 · Project checklists
Each checklist provides a quick starting point and links onward to the fuller planning resource where more detail is useful.
Capture the field and evidence pathway before the exact turf construction is selected.
Use these working templates when a project needs a repeatable procurement or document-management structure.
Use this before comparing modular tile and roll-out surfaces.
Capture the whole playing envelope before choosing a surface.
Define the rider group and surrounding site as well as the track footprint.
Define the training programme, site geometry and operating model before selecting SLOPEspan terrain.
Define the venue, spectator system and local project interfaces before a seating layout is treated as a procurement package.
Record the structural and operating details that width × drop alone cannot answer.
Coordinate structure, drainage and future enclosure before accessories.
Coordinate the complete landscape before individual fire, water, screen or planter products are frozen.
Plan the final position together with the transport and lifting route.
Turn the intended use and destination into a project-ready building brief.
Define the handover point, receiving party and required documents before shipment.
Give Apollo enough project context to review suitable systems and any additional product requirements without turning the brief into a generic product list.
Treat vehicle limits and travel rhythm as the hard boundaries of the setup.
Confirm the pickup and complete touring role before freezing a TerraRise configuration.
Plan the cooking zone, guest zone and local fire responsibilities before fixing the location.
04 · Comparison matrices
Knowledge-centre matrices are discovered from the live resource registry, so this section expands automatically as new matrix-backed authority guides are added.
Compare the design role, application, ventilation, shaping potential, weight consideration and key review issue across façade system families.
Use this as a starting structure. Not every project needs every document, and additional jurisdiction-specific evidence may be required by the local project team.
Use this table to check that the main product, documentation, commercial and logistics questions are visible before the order is finalised. The required detail should increase with structural, safety, technical, programme and commercial risk.
The quote should state the actual handover point. These common structures change which freight and receiving tasks sit inside the supplied scope and which remain with the purchaser or local project team.
This is a question-setting framework only. It highlights issues that often deserve early attention; it does not describe every project or replace country-specific engineering and statutory review.
Use this table to identify the dominant project questions in each zone before product selection is finalised. It is a briefing tool, not a fixed package or promise that every category will be supplied on every project.
The structural family follows the building use, geometry, loads and destination. This is an early briefing comparison only; final structural selection belongs to the project engineering and manufacturer design process.
Comparison matrix from Community Infrastructure Masterplanning Guide.
Comparison matrix from Housing After a Cyclone or Hurricane: Reconstruction Planning Guide.
Comparison matrix from Who is responsible for what on an international modular infrastructure project?.
Use this as an early project brief. It is deliberately broader than a product schedule so operational and local-work gaps become visible before procurement.
Comparison matrix from Why can modular construction cost more to deliver to island nations?.
Comparison matrix from How to Compare Modular Housing Quotations.
Comparison matrix from Permanent vs Transitional Housing: What Changes in the Project Brief?.
Comparison matrix from Pilot Project vs Full Rollout for Modular Housing Programmes.
Comparison matrix from International Development Infrastructure Delivery Handbook.
Comparison matrix from Post-Disaster Reconstruction Infrastructure Planning Guide.
Comparison matrix from Remote Clinic Infrastructure Planning Guide.
Comparison matrix from Remote Community Infrastructure Handbook.
Comparison matrix from What documents should be ready before an international development RFP is issued?.
Comparison matrix from Rebuilding Schools After a Disaster.
Comparison matrix from Humanitarian & Development Project Procurement Checklist.
Comparison matrix from WASH & Sanitation Infrastructure Planning Guide.
Comparison matrix from Planning Community Infrastructure Where Water Is Scarce.
Market-by-market view of Apollo product pathways across current target regions.
International-project comparison covering destination, climate, local requirements, freight handover, site interfaces and receiving documents.
The same equipment families can appear across different venues, but the design priorities change. Use this matrix to shape the first brief before product selection.
Use the published references below for early planning only. Final quoted model data should control structural support, lifting and transport.
Use this as an early comfort-and-use comparison. Exact fabric construction, openness, dimensions, wind behaviour and weather performance remain model- and project-specific.
Use this as an early routing guide. Final product selection remains project-specific.
Use the project requirement—not the brand name—to choose the correct pool family.
The same modular pool can create very different site interfaces depending on how it relates to ground level, decks and surrounding structures. Use this matrix before foundations and landscaping are frozen.
Use this as an early pathway comparison. Final glass, hardware, fixing, load and compliance requirements remain specific to the project and destination.
Use the matrix to check whether the tender package is ready to compare like with like. It does not replace the project contract, consultant documents or destination-specific procurement requirements.
Use this to decide which public pathway deserves technical review. It is not a ranking and does not replace current product data or project-specific testing.
This matrix is an early scoping tool, not a structural diagnosis. The local project team should confirm the repair method where defects extend beyond the finished sports surface.
The two pathways solve the playing surface differently. This table keeps the comparison at project-planning level so the exact product can be verified later.
Use this as an early scoping framework. Final acoustic requirements remain site- and destination-specific.
This matrix compares the practical role of each format within a commercial gym. It does not prescribe thickness, density or impact performance, which remain product- and project-specific.
Use this as an early planning reference. It compares the role each broad surface family can play before a specific product, thickness, fixing method or project-dependent performance requirement is selected.
Compare portable bleachers, retractable seating, aluminium and steel grandstands, covered stands and fixed stadium seating before project-specific layout.
05 · Specification toolkit
Use these resources between the project brief and the final project-specific specification to keep requirements, responsibilities and unresolved items clear through procurement.
Copyable early-stage clauses for current information, technical documents, supply scope, substitutions, submittals, mock-ups, revision control, logistics, warranty and spares.
A structured comparison of specified requirements, proposed alternatives, supporting technical information, lifecycle support and declared deviations.
A project-focused request schedule for the technical documents needed for the exact product and configuration.
A responsibility and project-information schedule that keeps confirmed, project-dependent and unresolved requirements visible before tender.
Current project information
Use the current product page, applicable technical documents and project quotation when exact product or project requirements need to be confirmed.