Start Project Brief
Decision Centre
These are different system strategies, not simply different amounts of the same material. The right pathway depends on the sport, playing programme, maintenance capability, base, shock layer and exact performance evidence.
Typical fitProjects using a complete turf construction designed around stabilising and/or performance infill.
Established system route across many field applications
Infill can support fibre stability and system response
Wide range of project configurations
—Requires infill management and redistribution
—Material quantity and type are system-specific
—Performance evidence must match the complete construction
Typical fitProjects seeking lower infill quantities where the turf construction is specifically designed for that approach.
Reduces reliance on larger infill quantities
Can suit projects where material management is a key consideration
Maintains a distinct engineered system pathway
—Not created by simply removing infill from a conventional system
—Maintenance still required
—Exact product evidence must support the lower-infill construction
Typical fitSelected projects where the surface is designed to operate without conventional performance infill.
No conventional performance infill on the playing surface
May simplify some infill-management tasks
Distinct option for selected applications
—Fibre, backing and lower-layer design become especially important
—Shock layer requirements may differ
—Cleaning and fibre management still matter
Project decision inputs
Continue planning
Important
The exact construction, product evidence, installation requirements and any certification or testing pathway are confirmed against the actual project.