Start Project Brief
Decision Centre
These surface families create different playing and maintenance environments. The choice should follow the intended users, desired court response, existing base and operating model rather than a generic idea of which surface is better.
Typical fitClubs, schools, resorts and recreation projects seeking a synthetic turf playing surface.
Distinctive turf playing feel
Can suit selected conversion and recreation projects
Available in multiple project pathways
—Infill and maintenance vary by exact product
—Court response must be matched to the intended programme
—Base and drainage still matter
Typical fitProjects seeking a traditional hard-court pathway on a suitable rigid base.
Direct hard-court response
Clear line marking and colour zoning
Common pathway for dedicated tennis courts
—Base cracking and movement can telegraph through
—Surface preparation is critical
—Hardness and heat exposure may influence user preference
Typical fitProjects wanting a hard-court style surface with a resilient cushion build-up.
Retains a hard-court playing character
Adds a resilient layer within the coating system
Can suit premium club and commercial projects
—Requires suitable prepared base
—Cushion construction and coating system must be treated as one package
—Repairs and resurfacing follow a different maintenance route from turf
Project decision inputs
Continue planning
Important
The exact construction, product evidence, installation requirements and any certification or testing pathway are confirmed against the actual project.